A blockchain consensus mechanism that uses Proof of Solution to optimize energy dispatch and trading


  • Morstyn, T., Farrell, N., Darby, S. J. & McCulloch, M. D. Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants. Nat. Energy 3, 94–101 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parag, Y. & Sovacool, B. K. Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nat. Energy 1, 16032 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. & Mancarella, P. Modelling, assessment and sankey diagrams of integrated electricity–heat–gas networks in multi-vector district energy systems. Appl. Energy 167, 336–352 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., Zhou, Y., Long, C., Wu, J. & Jenkins, N. A general form of smart contract for decentralized energy systems management. Nat. Energy 4, 140–149 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargarian, A. et al. Toward distributed/decentralized DC optimal power flow implementation in future electric power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9, 2574–2594 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andoni, M. et al. Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 100, 143–174 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Silvestre, M. L. et al. Blockchain for power systems: current trends and future applications. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 119, 109585 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Belotti, M., Božić, N., Pujolle, G. & Secci, S. A vademecum on blockchain technologies: when, which, and how. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 3796–3838 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, N. U., Yuen, C. & Niyato, D. Blockchain technologies for smart energy systems: fundamentals, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 13, 106–118 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (Bitcoin, 2008).

  • Etherscan (Etherscan, 2015); https://etherscan.io/

  • Comprehensive Guide to Companies Involved in Blockchain & Energy (SolarPlaza, 2018).

  • Li, J., Li, N., Peng, J., Cui, H. & Wu, Z. Energy consumption of cryptocurrency mining: a study of electricity consumption in mining cryptocurrencies. Energy 168, 160–168 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiayias, A., Russell, A., David, B. & Oliynykov, R. A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol. In Annual International Cryptology Conference (eds Katz, J. et al.) 357–388 (Springer, 2017).

  • Fan, X. & Chai, Q. Roll-DPoS: a randomized delegated proof of stake scheme for scalable blockchain-based Internet of things systems. In Proc. 15th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (eds Schulzrinne, H. et al.) 482–484 (ACM, 2018).

  • Rouhani, S. & Deters, R. Performance analysis of Ethereum transactions in private blockchain. In 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (eds Li, W. et al.) 70–74 (IEEE, 2017).

  • Miller, A., Juels, A., Shi, E., Parno, B. & Katz, J. Permacoin: repurposing Bitcoin work for data preservation. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (eds Shannon, G.) 475–490 (IEEE, 2014).

  • Castro, M. & Liskov, B. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. OSDI ’99: Proc. 3rd symposium on Operating systems design and implementation. (eds Seltzer, M. et al.) 173–186 (USENIX Association, 1999).

  • Su, Z. et al. A secure charging scheme for electric vehicles with smart communities in energy blockchain. IEEE Internet Things J. 6, 4601–4613 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushar, W., Saha, T. K., Yuen, C., Smith, D. & Poor, H. V. Peer-to-peer trading in electricity networks: an overview. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11, 3185–3200 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushar, W. et al. Challenges and prospects for negawatt trading in light of recent technological developments. Nat. Energy 5, 834–841 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushar, W. et al. Peer-to-peer energy systems for connected communities: a review of recent advances and emerging challenges. Appl. Energy 282, 116131 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Molzahn, D. K. et al. A survey of distributed optimization and control algorithms for electric power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8, 2941 – 2962 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • AlAshery, M. K. et al. A blockchain-enabled multi-settlement quasi-ideal peer-to-peer trading framework. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 12, 885–896 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, N. Proof-of-search: combining blockchain consensus formation with solving optimization problems. IEEE Access 7, 172994–173006 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, F., Dong, Z. Y., Liang, G., Murata, J. & Xu, Z. A distributed electricity trading system in active distribution networks based on multi-agent coalition and blockchain. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 34, 4097–4108 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Yang, W., He, P., Chen, C. & Wang, X. Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain. Appl. Energy 248, 390–405 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Taha, A. F., Wang, J., Kvaternik, K. & Hahn, A. Energy crowdsourcing and peer-to-peer energy trading in blockchain-enabled smart grids. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 49, 1612–1623 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Silvestre, M. L. et al. Ancillary services in the energy blockchain for microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 55, 7310–7319 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, A. L. Experience with PJM market operation, system design, and implementation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18, 528–534 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Erseghe, T. Distributed optimal power flow using ADMM. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29, 2370–2380 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguado, J. & Quintana, V. Inter-utilities power-exchange coordination: a market-oriented approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16, 513–519 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, X., Chen, S., Yan, Z. & Xi, J. A neurodynamic approach to distributed optimization with globally coupled constraints. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 48, 3149–3158 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Xu, C., Yan, Z., Guan, X. & Le, X. Accommodating strategic players in distributed algorithms for power dispatch problems. IEEE Trans. Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3085400 (2021).

  • Chen, S. et al. A trusted energy trading framework by marrying blockchain and optimization. Adv. Appl. Energy 2, 100029 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Zhang, L., Yan, Z. & Shen, Z. A distributed and robust security-constrained economic dispatch algorithm based on blockchain. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 37, 691–700 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, J., Yan, Z., Chen, S., Yao, L. & Qian, M. Coordinating EV charging via blockchain. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 8, 573–581 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, J., Yan, Z. & Chen, S. A two-stage autonomous EV charging coordination method enabled by blockchain. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 9, 104–113 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Conejo, A., Castillo, E., Minguez, R. & Garcia-Bertrand, R. in Decomposition Techniques in Mathematical Programming (eds Conejo, A. et al.) Ch. 1 (Springer, 2006).

  • Palomar, D. P. & Chiang, M. A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 24, 1439–1451 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y. et al. Decentralized operation of interdependent power distribution network and district heating network: a market-driven approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10, 5374–5385 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Yan, Z. & Wu, J. Optimal coordinated operation of a multi-energy community considering interactions between energy storage and conversion devices. Appl. Energy 248, 256–273 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, Y., Hemo, R., Micali, S., Vlachos, G. & Zeldovich, N. Algorand: scaling Byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies. In Proc. 26th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (eds Chen, H. et al.) 51–68 (ACM, 2017).

  • Milutinovic, M., He, W., Wu, H. & Kanwal, M. Proof of luck: an efficient blockchain consensus protocol. In Proc. 1st Workshop on System Software for Trusted Execution (eds Felber, P. et al.) 1–6 (ACM, 2016).

  • Lamport, L., Shostark, R. & Pease, M. The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4, 382–401 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 



  • Source link

    spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

    Latest articles

    Related articles

    Leave a reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    spot_imgspot_img